undefined

MOST CLICKED

 

October 13, 2012 07:51 AM

Gaming Board Improves State's Video Poker Play

Thanks to a deck that has been reshuffled and re-cut, the odds are even that legalized video gambling in Illinois can be fun for some players, profitable for some governments and, we hope, ruinous for fewer gaming addicts.

By Andy Shaw/BGA

Comments (2)

Share Print Email

The bill legalizing video poker in Illinois, described by detractors as the "crack cocaine of gaming" because of its addictive quality, emerged from the bowels of the state Capitol in Springfield three-and-a-half years ago as a legislative loser.

Video Poker No Longer a Bad Bet for IllinoisIt carried the stench of a backroom deal cut in the dark of night by political insiders who ignored blatant conflicts of interest to muscle it through the General Assembly without careful consideration of the consequences.

But video poker’s had a makeover since then---been through rehab and behavior modification—so its actual debut this week, in 65 locations around the state, felt more like the rollout of a new video game than the yawning of the Gates of Hell.

The moral of the story, and it’s an important one, is that government—even in dysfunctional Illinois--can turn chicken s—t into chicken salad when honest public servants care more about protecting the public than rewarding the rogues.

Illinois initially approved 45,000 video poker machines for bars, veterans’ halls and truck stops. The anticipated revenue, several hundred million dollars a year, was earmarked for infrastructure upgrades--roads, bridges, public buildings and transit lines.

But the hasty enactment of a gargantuan gambling expansion failed to consider legitimate concerns raised by the BGA and other watchdog groups about the Illinois Gaming Board’s woeful lack of resources to adequately vet license applicants for mob ties, criminal backgrounds and financial stability.

So gaming board chairman Aaron Jaffe, a former judge and, more importantly, a righteous regulator, hit the "tilt" button by proclaiming that no license would be awarded until the board had enough investigative firepower to get the vetting right.

As a result, the rigorous background checks, financial assessments and technical safeguards that produced the first licensees took more than three years, which turns out to be one of the best delays in regulatory history.

The board is just as methodically making its way through 2,600 additional applications, and that’s reassuring.

Local governments also put on their own brakes in response to the outcry over the bill’s illegitimate birth and video poker’s insidious side effects.

More than 300 communities either voted to outlaw video poker or discovered existing prohibitions, and 525 are still deliberating.

Chicago is the biggest municipality with a ban on the books, and Mayor Emanuel’s shown no inclination to challenge it, opting to put his gaming energy into a Chicago casino.

As for the early revenue estimates, they’ll be revised downward, even though the funding formula remains the same: The state gets 25 percent of the net income, local governments 5 percent, machine operators just under 1 percent, and gaming establishments the rest.

So we won’t be able to build as many roads and bridges as originally envisioned. But we won’t have as many broken families and bankrupt individuals as originally feared. And these gaming revenues will stay in Illinois.

Video poker was a bad bet in `09. But today, thanks to a deck that’s been reshuffled and re-cut by honest dealers led by Aaron Jaffe, the odds are even that it can be fun for some players, profitable for some governments and, we hope, ruinous for fewer gaming addicts.

That’s a bet we’ll grudgingly take.

Andy Shaw is president and CEO of the Better Government Association. Contact him at ashaw@bettergov.org or (312) 386-9097.


If you appreciate the work of the BGA, please consider making a donation.

 



Comments (2)

Mark Evenson
Andy, so disappointing to see this coming from you, tarnishing the reputation of the BGA. Since when is it a "good bet" to run government by encouraging others to lose their money from gambling, just so it can take its small slice of the booty? So, the local government gets 5% of the proceeds, 25% to the State and 35% each to the terminal operator and hosting establishment. Millions of dollars siphoned out of the local economy, millions of dollars lost by many of the most vulnerable, just so that government can get its small take. If video gambling is considered "the crack cocaine of gambling" as you said, how has it now become good just because it may not be as extensive as originally thought? It is still bad!
12:57 AM Oct 14th
 
antigambler
What a bunch of malarkey! Video gambling is still a bad bet for the public. And, it's an even WORSE bet than casinos are for addicted gamblers. Here is why:1. Over 9,000 people have volunteered to be arrested if they get caught in one of the ten casinos. They won't have that fear at neighborhood casinos and will be attracted to them for that reason.2. In her book "Machine Zone:..", http://web.mit.edu/newsoffice/2009/vegas-tt0520.html Prof. Natasha Schull says that the most addictive form of gambling consists of "a constant flurry of little wins. Most players will stay on a machine longer if this is happening." With a $500 maximum jackpot, that is exactly what the now-legal video gambling will produce.3. Because $500 is the maximum jackpot that can be won, there will be (probably) no reporting of winnings to the IRS, such as is required at casinos for jackpots of over $1,200, just one more incentive for truly-addicted gamblers to gamble at neighborhood casinos.Correction to story: Gambling machine operators and licensed gambling establishments each get 35% of the take, with a less-than-1% slice taken out for Scientific Games.
1:04 PM Oct 14th
 
 
© 2013 Better Government Association. All Rights Reserved                     Site Map|Privacy Policy|Terms & Conditions|Contact Us Web site design and development by Americaneagle.com