undefined

MOST CLICKED

 

July 13, 2012 09:37 AM

Lansing Kills Public Pension Perk

After a Better Government Association investigation found the Village of Lansing giving retiring police and firefighters raises on their last day of work, the board voted to repeal the pension sweetener.

By Patrick Rehkamp/BGA

Comments (4)

Share Print Email

The village of Lansing’s trustees voted to immediately repeal a practice that improperly pads benefits for retiring police and firefighters, following a Better Government Association investigation into the matter.

Village President Norm Abbott Wednesday signed the resolution ending the nearly 20-year-old practice known as pension spiking.

"It kills the perk. It’s gone," Abbott said. "I love my police and fire department. They do a phenomenal job. But if you don’t have the money you don’t have the money."

Sticker ShockA BGA investigation found that over the past 20 or so years about 40 veteran Lansing police officers and firefighters were given salary boosts by the village as they were retiring, spiking their individual pensions by at least $6,000 each in the first year alone.

All together, at least $2.5 million in added pension payouts have been distributed since this taxpayer-funded perk was created in 1993.

Under the now-defunct plan, retiring first responders could take a 25 percent boost or $12,000 raise, whichever is greater, on their last day of work.

The only requirement was that it be taken within six months of accruing 20 years on the job and turning 50 years old. The original intent was to entice older cops and firefighters to retire to help keep the payroll down.

Individuals can still retire at age 50 if they have 20 years in.

The six-member village board voted 4-0 in favor of the repeal, with Trustee Julie Butler abstaining from the vote and Trustee Tony DeLaurentis absent. Butler’s husband is a Lansing cop and DeLaurentis has a son-in-law on the force.

The Lansing police pension fund currently holds around $24 million, which amounts to just 50 percent of expected liabilities. The fire fund, which holds about $9 million, is 60 percent funded. Pension funds must be at least 90 percent funded by 2040.

A representative for the police pension fund could not be reached and the fire pension fund declined to comment other than say the board acted within its authority.

This story was written and reported by the BGA’s Patrick Rehkamp, who can be reached at prehkamp@bettergov.org or (312) 386-9201.


If you appreciate the work of the BGA, please consider making a donation.

 



Comments (4)

Dave
"a practice that improperly pads benefits for retiring police and firefighters"If this practice was instituted to entice the most highly paid portion of the workforce to retire early, it is not improper. The repeal of the law could, in theory, cost the village more money. This is not some scam like the writer implies.
3:45 PM Jul 13th
 
Mike
So did the incentive program work to get 50-olds to retire? Is Lansing going to be hurting as older police and firefighters hang onto their jobs to build better retirement. Those higher paid employees are going to either keep Lansing from hiring more younger cheaper employees or cause them to raise taxes to pay the new higher payroll. Only time will tell if this was a wise more or not, but it should be noted that the policy was instituted in '93 for a reason.
9:41 PM Jul 22nd
 
Anonymous
Yes Mike, it was indeed instituted for a reason - so the then Police Chief, Fire Chief, and a Police Captain would retire. The then two Chiefs were hired back the next day at their same job. Their salaries were lower, however, they then went onto the IMRF retirement plan. They are now receiving two pensions from the Village of Lansing. Wow, didn't the taxpayers save money.
1:57 PM Jul 23rd
 
living high on the hog is what i hear at my place of business when i speak with village employees' about their supervisors and those in the village hall, who watches over the decissions that raise their pay when they slip a 4.9 property tax raise through to keep it from being a referendom. being a village resident an retailer for the past 14 years i've been paying raising property taxes almost every 2 to 3 years when is that going to stop
10:30 AM Mar 29th
 
 
© 2013 Better Government Association. All Rights Reserved                     Site Map|Privacy Policy|Terms & Conditions|Contact Us Web site design and development by Americaneagle.com