Do not publish before

You’re welcome to republish our articles and graphics for free under Creative Commons license CC BY-ND. We ask that you observe the following ground rules. Let us know if you republish our stories; it makes us happy!

Here’s what you need to know:

  1. You can’t change the story in any way except to change references to timing (say, “today” to “yesterday”) or to suit your in-house style rules (“Rockford” to “Rockford, Ill.”).
  2. If you have space constraints and want to shorten the story, we’re happy to consider your request. Please contact our Editor in Chief for approval. We will occasionally provide a shortened version of stories, which you would find below.
  3. You can republish provided photos and graphics as long as you’re running them on the stories with which they originally appeared and include original credits. You are not required to publish provided photos and graphics.
  4. Publish the author’s name using the following format: By Brett Chase , Better Government Association. Link back to our home page,, in that credit line.
  5. At the end of the story, when possible, please add the following: This story was produced by the Better Government Association, a nonprofit news organization based in Chicago. (This is automatically included if copying from HTML textarea.)
  6. Include our logo.
  7. Don’t resell the story to someone else.
  8. Don’t sell ads against our story. Feel free, however, to publish it on a page surrounded by ads you’ve already sold.
  9. If you publish our story online, please try your best to include all of our internal links. Don't apply rel="nofollow" to any of these links.
  10. If we send you a request to remove the content from your site, you must agree to do so immediately.

Tracking our stories:

Because the Better Government Association syndicates our work for free, we often have trouble tracking down how many people read BGA stories on our partners’ sites. We’ve implemented a tracker called Pixel Ping to help measure this audience. If your CMS allows, please assist us in this effort by including the code snippet below anywhere in the story's HTML. The tracker captures views only; no other information will be gathered.

How to do this:

  1. If you copy the HTML in the textarea below, the script is automatically included.

  2. Otherwise, please manually insert the following script into your source.

    <script async src="" crossorigin="anonymous" data-bga-canonical=""></script>

Social media:

When sharing republished BGA content, please include attribution to BGA social media accounts in your post:

Have questions? Please contact Ronnie Ramos, Editor in Chief, at


CDC To Review Air Pollution Near East St. Louis, Duckworth Says


Illinois senator asked for assessment of toxic releases from Veolia plant, a site profiled in a recent BGA story about President Trump’s diminished EPA.

Copy article content:

You are viewing the original version (664 words).

Federal health officials are reviewing whether toxic emissions from a Downstate hazardous waste incinerator pose health risks to surrounding residents, according to an official at the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The assessment comes amid a more than decade-long battle between the owner of the Veolia North America plant in Sauget, Ill., just outside of St. Louis, and environmental groups representing nearby residents seeking increased monitoring of airborne metals from the incinerator’s three smoke stacks.

U.S. Sen. Tammy Duckworth of Illinois requested the probe and, in a response on Nov. 14, the director of the CDC’s Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry said his team will review available information “to determine whether the data are sufficient for ATSDR to provide the community with a meaningful evaluation of public health impacts resulting from exposure.”

“We will send you a second letter indicating whether an assessment of the public health risks posed by the Veolia North America-Trade Waste Incinerator Facility is feasible or if we may be making recommendations to collect additional data,” Director Patrick Breysse wrote in the response to Duckworth.

On Nov. 15, the Better Government Association featured the Sauget controversy in an investigation into the effects of cutbacks at the Environmental Protection Agency under President Donald Trump.

“I’m excited. Maybe we will move this along because lives are at stake,” said Mamie Cosey, a 78-year-old great-grandmother who lives near the incinerator and was highlighted in the BGA story. “I told my story for my great-grandchildren and the other children in our community.”

Residents “deserve a full investigation into the potential health concerns stemming from the weakening of pollution controls at a local waste facility and I’m encouraged by the announcement of a federal review of this very serious problem,” Duckworth said in Nov. 20 statement announcing the CDC decision. “I’ll continue working to get to the bottom of it.”

Contacted Wednesday, a Veolia spokeswoman said the company welcomes the scrutiny.

Community and environmental organizations have been asking for stricter monitoring of the toxic releases at the plant for more than a decade. In the final days of Barack Obama’s presidency, his EPA approved tougher rules to track the air pollution from the Veolia plant, but that decision was reversed earlier this year by Trump’s EPA. 

The ATSDR director told Duckworth in the letter that his agency will work closely with the EPA and Illinois public health and environmental agencies to gather available data and conduct monitoring assessments to make its initial determination about whether the emissions of mercury, lead, arsenic and other metals pose a danger to residents of Sauget and the surrounding neighborhoods, including East St. Louis.

Duckworth first requested the investigation in an Oct. 18 letter to Breysse.

“EPA recently revised the permit to free Veolia from monitoring all metal emissions except for mercury,” Duckworth wrote. “Community leaders, residents and I are deeply concerned that this dramatic weakening in pollution controls puts public health at risk.”

One environmental lawyer who has fought for stiffer monitoring at the plant said she is happy for the CDC intervention. 

“It’s good that someone is investigating to see what they have been exposed to,” said Elizabeth Hubertz, of the environmental law clinic at Washington University in St. Louis.

The BGA investigation highlighted the Veolia incinerator as an example of regulatory rollbacks by Trump’s EPA. The BGA found the agency’s Chicago office, which oversees six Midwest states, has been hit hard. Inspections performed by the Chicago office of EPA under Trump plunged 60%, compared with a 30% decline throughout the rest of the country. 

There are roughly 150 fewer scientists, technicians and support staff in the Chicago office since Trump became president, according to EPA documents provided by employee union officials. In several important environmental cases, employees documented their objections to superiors overruling their scientific and technical expertise in favor of polluters.

This story was produced by the Better Government Association, a nonprofit news organization based in Chicago.

Republishable images:

No images available to republish.

Republishable graphics:

DocumentCloud: Duckworth ATSDR Letters

DocumentCloud: Duckworth ATSDR Letters

<div id="DV-viewer-6555518-Duckworth-ATSDR-Letters" class="DC-embed DC-embed-document DV-container"></div> <script src="//"></script> <script> DV.load("", { responsive: true, sidebar: false, container: "#DV-viewer-6555518-Duckworth-ATSDR-Letters" }); </script> <noscript> <a href="">Duckworth ATSDR Letters (PDF)</a> <br /> <a href="">Duckworth ATSDR Letters (Text)</a> </noscript>